Banking Concept Of Education Examples


I have always been a good student. I studied hard and got good grades. But there was always something that bothered me about the education system. It wasn’t until I read Paulo Freire’s “The Banking Concept of Education” that I realized what it was.

The banking concept of education is the idea that the teacher is the depositary of knowledge and the students are the receptacles. This bothered me because it made education seem like a one-way street. The teacher pours knowledge into the students and the students just soak it up.

But that’s not how learning works. Learning is an active process. It requires engagement from both the teacher and the student. When I finally understood this, I was able to see education in a whole new light.

Now, I believe that education is about dialogue and critical thinking. It’s about working together to find solutions to problems. It’s not about passively receiving information from a teacher. It’s about engaging with the material and each other to create something new. Education should be joyful, liberating, and empowering. And it all starts with understanding the banking concept of education.

Paulo Freire is the author of a number of well-known books, including “The ‘Banking’ Concept of Education,” which is still widely used in schools today. The term “banking” refers to a method of instruction that Paulo Freire considers to be outdated and harmful to students.

This method of learning, where the teacher is the authority figure and the student is the empty vessel to be filled with the knowledge of the instructor, does not teach students how to think for themselves. In fact, it suppresses critical thinking and creativity.

Freire’s philosophy advocates for a different approach, what he calls “problem-posing education.” In this type of setting, teachers are facilitators instead of dictators and students are encouraged to be proactive in their own learning. This concept allows for growth and development, as opposed to stunting intellectual growth.

When students are given the opportunity to voice their thoughts and opinions in a safe and welcoming environment, they are more likely to take risks and explore new ideas. As a result, they will be better equipped to deal with the challenges they face both in and out of the classroom.

It is important that we, as educators, are aware of the different methods of instruction and how each one can impact our students. We must be conscious of the way we are teaching and why we are teaching in that manner. Only then can we hope to create an environment in which all students can learn and grow to their fullest potential.

“Instead of communicating, the instructor issues communiques and makes deposits that are received, memorized, and repeated by the pupils. This is a concept of education in which students’ action is limited to receiving, filing, and storing the bank payments.” (Freire 260) I have always been trapped with “bankers” as my instructors and none of them able to really teach me anything I previously memorized or applied.

Education, to me, was a chore that I was forced to do because my parents wanted me to have a successful future. Education, at this point in my life, meant good grades so I could get into a good college so I could have a successful career. None of my teachers communicated with me on personal level; they were always busy grading papers or coming up with new ways to make us study more. It was all about the deposits they were making into our “memory banks.”

As I started college, I began to realize that there are different types of education philosophies out there and that some of them actually care about their students and want them to succeed. My professor for my Education and Social Change class is one of those types of teachers. Education, for him, is not just about making sure his students get good grades and memorize information; it is about social change and bettering the world we live in.

In his class, we discuss controversial topics and learn how to have civil conversations with people who have different opinions than us. We learn about different education philosophies and which ones work best in certain situations. This type of classroom environment has allowed me to open up and share my own opinions and experiences with others. I am no longer just a “receiver” of information; I am an active participant in my own education.

I recall my first year of high school when I attended public school and a teacher who was very used to teaching under the banking model. Her name was Ms. Bincheski. Ms. Bincheski was a math instructor who gave the impression that she regarded herself far superior to her pupils.

She would undercut me for not comprehending the material as if it were something I was born knowing about When I would ask for help she would make me feel as though I was bothering her or that I should have already known the answer. It made me feel terrible about myself and my abilities. Ms. Bincheski is just one example of how the banking concept can negatively impact a student’s education.

The banking concept of education is when teachers treat students as if they are empty vessels that need to be filled with information. This method of teaching does not allow for any creativity or critical thinking. Students are simply expected to regurgitate the information they are given. This can be extremely detrimental to a student’s education, as it does not allow them to develop their own understanding of the material.

I am fortunate enough to now have teachers who encourage creativity and critical thinking. However, I still see the effects of the banking concept of education in my classmates. There are many students who simply do not feel confident in their abilities because they were never given the opportunity to develop them.

The banking concept of education is something that needs to be changed. Teachers need to be more encouraging and allow for more student involvement. Only then will students be able to reach their full potential.

Education, especially in underdeveloped countries, has been a controversial topic with many different approaches on how schooling should be done in order to achieve the best results. One approach is known as “the banking concept of education” where it is believed that students are like empty vessels that need to be filled with knowledge by the teacher. This approach has been hotly debated with many people believing that it is detrimental to a student’s education and development.

Since I asked a lot of questions and had trouble comprehending math tasks, I was treated as stupid. Because I would be spoken down to in response, as well as given the answers, I became hesitant to ask questions.

Education became a chore where I would show up, do the work and leave. I was an obedient student who listened to what the teacher said and followed along but it never seemed to be good enough. No matter how much effort I put in I always felt like I was falling behind because my understanding wasn’t where it should have been.

This all changed when I had a teacher in high school who believed that every student had the potential to succeed as long as they were willing to put in the work. He fostered a learning environment where questions were encouraged and no one was made to feel stupid for not understanding something. If we didn’t understand something he would take the time to explain it in a way that we could all understand. He made learning fun and engaging and for the first time I looked forward to going to class.

This experience showed me that the banking concept of education is flawed. Education should be about empowering students and helping them to reach their potential, not just filling their heads with information. When students are treated like they are capable of great things they will usually live up to those expectations, but when they are told they are not good enough they will often believe it.

Education should be about finding out what students are interested in and helping them to grow as individuals, not just preparing them for a job. Every student is different and should be treated as such, not all students learn in the same way and that should be taken into account when teaching.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.